The decision between Total War: Empire and Total War: Napoleon ultimately depends on your personal preferences. Empire offers a larger scope with a focus on global conquest and management, while Napoleon provides a more focused experience on the Napoleonic Wars in Europe. If you enjoy grand strategy and managing vast empires, Empire may be the better choice. However, if you prefer a more focused and intense tactical experience, Napoleon could be the game for you. Ultimately, consider your preferred time period and gameplay style to make the best decision for your gaming preferences. **

Total war was propagated because it allowed nations to mobilize all of their resources, both military and civilian, in order to achieve victory. This meant that not only the military, but also the entire population and economy of a country were geared towards the war effort. Total war was seen as necessary in order to fully commit a nation to the conflict and to ensure that it had the best chance of achieving victory. Additionally, the concept of total war was also used as a means of justifying the targeting of civilian populations and infrastructure in order to weaken the enemy's ability to wage war. **

Total war refers to a conflict in which a nation mobilizes all of its resources, both military and civilian, towards the war effort. This includes not only the armed forces, but also the economy, industry, and propaganda. In total war, the entire population is involved in supporting the war, and the distinction between combatants and non-combatants becomes blurred. This type of warfare often leads to widespread destruction and suffering, as the goal is to completely defeat the enemy and achieve total victory. **

War is a conflict between two or more countries or groups, typically involving military action and often with specific political or territorial objectives. Total war, on the other hand, is a type of war in which a country mobilizes all of its resources, including its civilian population, to support the war effort. In total war, there is a complete and unrestricted mobilization of all available resources and the targeting of not only military forces but also the infrastructure and population of the enemy. Total war often involves a complete disregard for the distinction between combatants and non-combatants, and can result in widespread destruction and suffering. **

Germany wanted total war because they believed it was necessary to achieve their military and political objectives. They saw total war as a way to mobilize all resources, both military and civilian, to ensure victory. Additionally, they believed that total war would demonstrate their strength and determination to their enemies, potentially leading to a quicker end to the conflict. Lastly, the German leadership believed that total war would unite the population behind the war effort and boost morale. **

Total war refers to a conflict in which a nation mobilizes all of its resources, including its civilian population, to support the war effort. This includes not only the military, but also the economy, industry, and propaganda. In total war, there is no distinction between combatants and non-combatants, and the goal is to completely defeat the enemy by any means necessary. This type of warfare often leads to widespread destruction and suffering, as seen in World War II with the bombing of cities and the targeting of civilian populations. **

Total war is a concept in history that refers to a war in which a country mobilizes all of its resources, both military and civilian, towards the war effort. This includes not only the military forces, but also the economy, industry, and propaganda. Total war often involves the targeting of civilian populations and infrastructure in order to weaken the enemy's ability to fight. Examples of total war in history include World War I and World War II, where entire societies were mobilized for the war effort and civilian populations were directly affected by the conflict. **

"Total defeat" following the total war in the Second World War could refer to the complete military, economic, and political collapse of a country. It could mean the unconditional surrender of the defeated nation, resulting in occupation, disarmament, and restructuring of its government and society by the victorious powers. Total defeat could also entail the loss of territory, resources, and sovereignty, as well as the imposition of reparations and war guilt on the defeated nation. Ultimately, "total defeat" in the context of the Second World War signified a comprehensive and devastating outcome for the losing side. **